Future of “Natural” Pain Relievers (V3)
1. "Natural" pain relievers (both internal and oral) are good at being transparent regarding natural ingredients, newest superfruits, blends, and herbs and the ability for you to instantly feel at ease. The packaging is usually descriptive, with organs shown and the visuals diagramming a flow rather than obstruction - working with the "body's natural order." They are not so good at purported results as it is often nebulous and in most cases not medically proven. So it's often a try and see type of experience.
2. The Internal/Oral Pain Relievers described as unique, uses various kinds of herbs and ingredients that are intriguing, and most of all are unique in solving varying maladies.
a. I like that they are a homeopathic and holistic (organic Non-GMO) alternative to managing pain from the inside out - delivering only what is needed to target the pain.
b. I don't like that they fact that they don't specify something relating to science. In other words, although enticing, it's feels theory based - especially with the combination of new ingredients, like Devil's claw and Pine Bark - what do these two ingredients actually do?
c. I would use these initially as an addition, but over time, based on its effectiveness, I would use it alternatively. I don't like over-medicating myself.
d. I would like to see some type of seal, authority or even medical claim substantiating its effectiveness. Most of the copy feels prevention oriented.
3. I love the External/Topical Pain Relievers descriptors. Unique, Ingredient focused, Natural, and great descriptors for what each ingredient supposedly does.
a. I like the fact that it is Doctor recommended and the ingredients seems to compliment the ailment by penetrating to the root. It gives you the problem and the possible solution.
b. Nothing!
c. I would actually fast forward and use this as a definite replacement. It feels much more targeted and long lasting to combat future pain.
d. I really feel it's perfect. My critique would only be explaining what kind Doctor recommended.
4. I prefer the "natural" pain relievers you ingest as they are more focused and travel to various parts of the body. Topical pain relievers are nice, but due to day to day activity and sometimes smell, I tend to use them only at night - as they might brush off at the gym or work.
5. I feel like all 4 are a mind meld in the realm of "conventional" pain relieving brands. But if I had to choose, I would say Tylenol. They seem more sensitive, natural, and honest. I could see Tylenol coming out with a "natural" pain reliever that was just as effective, but using ingredients that are focused on a wellness approach.
Bayer to some degree as well, however, I still get this idea that it would be in two camps - high dose and low dose, so my trust for them venturing into "natural" is shaky.
I don't see Advil or Aleve producing a "natural" pain reliever because they are all about impact, strength, and combating illness. They seem too forceful and so does their ingredients. The two brands are about the biggest bang for your buck despite possible future health implications.
2. The Internal/Oral Pain Relievers described as unique, uses various kinds of herbs and ingredients that are intriguing, and most of all are unique in solving varying maladies.
a. I like that they are a homeopathic and holistic (organic Non-GMO) alternative to managing pain from the inside out - delivering only what is needed to target the pain.
b. I don't like that they fact that they don't specify something relating to science. In other words, although enticing, it's feels theory based - especially with the combination of new ingredients, like Devil's claw and Pine Bark - what do these two ingredients actually do?
c. I would use these initially as an addition, but over time, based on its effectiveness, I would use it alternatively. I don't like over-medicating myself.
d. I would like to see some type of seal, authority or even medical claim substantiating its effectiveness. Most of the copy feels prevention oriented.
3. I love the External/Topical Pain Relievers descriptors. Unique, Ingredient focused, Natural, and great descriptors for what each ingredient supposedly does.
a. I like the fact that it is Doctor recommended and the ingredients seems to compliment the ailment by penetrating to the root. It gives you the problem and the possible solution.
b. Nothing!
c. I would actually fast forward and use this as a definite replacement. It feels much more targeted and long lasting to combat future pain.
d. I really feel it's perfect. My critique would only be explaining what kind Doctor recommended.
4. I prefer the "natural" pain relievers you ingest as they are more focused and travel to various parts of the body. Topical pain relievers are nice, but due to day to day activity and sometimes smell, I tend to use them only at night - as they might brush off at the gym or work.
5. I feel like all 4 are a mind meld in the realm of "conventional" pain relieving brands. But if I had to choose, I would say Tylenol. They seem more sensitive, natural, and honest. I could see Tylenol coming out with a "natural" pain reliever that was just as effective, but using ingredients that are focused on a wellness approach.
Bayer to some degree as well, however, I still get this idea that it would be in two camps - high dose and low dose, so my trust for them venturing into "natural" is shaky.
I don't see Advil or Aleve producing a "natural" pain reliever because they are all about impact, strength, and combating illness. They seem too forceful and so does their ingredients. The two brands are about the biggest bang for your buck despite possible future health implications.
Comments
Post a Comment